Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
REVISION FEEDBACK
- INTRO IMPROVED
- INFO ADDED
- ORGANIZATION IMPROVED, BUT PARAGRAPHS STILL NEED ORGANIZING.
- NICE REGROUPING OF STUDENT INFO
- STILL TO MANY TYPOS
- APA STYLE STILL NOT USED.
REVISION FEEDBACK 2
- REORGANIZATION IMPROVED, BUT THE COMMUNITY SECTION SEEMS TO FOCUS ON SCHOOL INSTEAD OF REGION. IT WOULD BE NICE TO HEAR ABOUT AVERAGE INCOME, DEMOGRAPHICS, ETC.
- CONCLUSION UNCHANGED.
Total Score for this Evaluation: 27 /35 pts
Rubric
Introduction = 5/ 5 pts.
5 - Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4 - Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3 - Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2 - Intro fails to name the school, district, and community.
0 - No introduction section is apparent.
Constructive comments about report's introduction:
Organization = 4/ 5 pts.
5 - Report includes an Introduction, a Conclusion, and sections for the School, District, and Community. Within each section, paragraphs logically group the information presented.
4 - Report includes all of the sections mentioned previously, but does not break down information into paragraphs within each section.
3 - Report is missing one of the sections.
2 - Report is missing more than one section.
0 - Report does not include any sections.
LITTLE OR NO INFO ON COMMUNITY OR DISTRICT.
Mechanics = 4 / 5 pts.
5 - All information in the report is cited using APA styled- citations after the information and in a Reference section at the end of the report.
and
There are extremely few typos and misspelled words in the report.
4 - Most information is cited using APA style.
and/or
There are a noticeable number of typos or misspellings.
3 - Some citations in the References section are not in APA style, e.g. URLs are listed without the title of the website.
and/or
There are many typos, misspellings, or other writing errors.
2 - Most of the report's information is not cited, or APA style was not used.
0 - Report does not include a Reference section.
MOST INFO NOT CITED; NUMEROUS TYPOS/MISSPELLINGS.
Conclusion = 3 / 5 pts.
5 - Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4 - Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community.
3 - Conclusion does not refer back to report findings.
0 - No conclusion section is apparent.
Strengths and constructive comments about conclusion:
Creativity = 3 / 5 pts.
5 - Report is written in an engaging style.
4 - Report has some interesting sections.
3 - Report generally reports information without seemingly without purpose.
PARAGRAPHS SEEM TO LIST SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS, BUT DO NOT PAINT AN OVERALL PICTURE.
Thoroughness = 8/10 pts
5 - Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and
compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average) and
states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
4 - Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and
compares most figures with relevant values and
states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
3 - Report includes at least six different facts in each section and
compares some of the figures to other relevant figures
2 - Report includes at least four different facts in each section and
compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0 - Report includes less than four different facts for any section or
fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Title: Lincoln High School
Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
REVISION FEEDBACK- INTRO IMPROVED
- INFO ADDED
- ORGANIZATION IMPROVED, BUT PARAGRAPHS STILL NEED ORGANIZING.
- NICE REGROUPING OF STUDENT INFO
- STILL TO MANY TYPOS
- APA STYLE STILL NOT USED.
REVISION FEEDBACK 2
- REORGANIZATION IMPROVED, BUT THE COMMUNITY SECTION SEEMS TO FOCUS ON SCHOOL INSTEAD OF REGION. IT WOULD BE NICE TO HEAR ABOUT AVERAGE INCOME, DEMOGRAPHICS, ETC.
- CONCLUSION UNCHANGED.
Total Score for this Evaluation: 27 /35 pts
Rubric
Introduction = 5/ 5 pts.
Organization = 4/ 5 pts.
Mechanics = 4 / 5 pts.
and
There are extremely few typos and misspelled words in the report.
and/or
There are a noticeable number of typos or misspellings.
and/or
There are many typos, misspellings, or other writing errors.
Conclusion = 3 / 5 pts.
Creativity = 3 / 5 pts.
Thoroughness = 8/10 pts
compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average) and
states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
compares most figures with relevant values and
states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
compares some of the figures to other relevant figures
compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.